everything like such as blah

• 29 Jan 10

  stevenf:

  I need to talk to you about computers. I’ve been on a veritable roller-coaster of “how I feel” about the iPad announcement, and trying not to write about it until I had at least an inkling of what was at the root of that.

  Before we begin, a reminder: On this blog, I speak only for myself, not for my company or my co-workers.

  The thing is, to talk about specific hardware (like the iPad or iPhone or Nexus One or Droid) is to miss entirely the point I’m about to try to make. This is more important than USB ports, GPS modules, or front-facing cameras. Gigabytes, gigahertz, megapixels, screen resolution, physical dimensions, form factors, in fact hardware in general — these are all irrelevant to the following discussion. So, I’m going to try to completely avoid talking about those sorts of things.

  Let’s instead establish some new terminology: Old World and New World computing.

  Introduction

  Personal computing — having a computer in your house (or your pocket) — as a whole is young. As we know it today, it’s less than a half-century old. It’s younger than TV, younger than radio, younger than cars and airplanes, younger than quite a few living people in fact.

  In that really incredibly short space of time we’ve gone from punchcards-and-printers to interactive terminals with command lines to window-and-mouse interfaces, each a paradigm shift unto themselves. A lot of thoughtful people, many of whom are bloggers, look at this history and say, “Look at this march of progress! Surely the desktop + windows + mouse interface can’t be the end of the road? What’s next?”

  Then “next” arrived and it was so unrecognizable to most of them (myself included) that we looked at it said, “What in the shit is this?”

  The Old World

  In the Old World, computers are general purpose, do-it-all machines. They can do hundreds of thousands of different things, sometimes all at the same time. We buy them for pennies, load them up to the gills with whatever we feel like, and then we pay for it with instability, performance degradation, viruses, and steep learning curves. Old World computers can do pretty much anything, but carry the burden of 30 years of rapid, unplanned change. Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X based computers all fall into this category.

  The New World

  In the New World, computers are task-centric. We are reading email, browsing the web, playing a game, but not all at once. Applications are sandboxed, then moats dug around the sandboxes, and then barbed wire placed around the moats. As a direct result, New World computers do not need virus scanners, their batteries last longer, and they rarely crash, but their users have lost a degree of freedom. New World computers have unprecedented ease of use, and benefit from decades of research into human-computer interaction. They are immediately understandable, fast, stable, and laser-focused on the 80% of the famous 80/20 rule.

  Is the New World better than the Old World? Nothing’s ever simply black or white.

  Floppy Disks

  An anecdote: When the iMac came out, Apple drew a line in the sand. They said: we are no longer going to ship a computer with a floppy disk drive. The entire industry shit its pants so loudly and forcefully that you probably could have heard it from outer space.

  Are you insane? I spent all this money on a floppy drive! All my software is on floppy disks! You’ve committed brand suicide! Nobody will stand for this!

  Fast-forward to today. I can’t think of a single useful thing to do with a floppy disk. I can go to the supermarket and buy a CD, DVD, or flash drive that is faster, smaller, and stores 1,000 times as much data for typically less than a box of floppies used to cost. Or better still, we can just toss things to each other over the network.

  To get there, yes, we had to throw away some of our investment in hardware. We had to re-think how we did things. It required adjustment. A bit of sacrifice. The end result, I think we can all agree regardless of what platform we use, is orders of magnitude more convenient, easier to use, and in line with today’s storage requirements.

  Staying with floppies would have spared us the inconvenience of that transition but at what long-term cost?

  Nothing is ever simply black or white. There was a cost to making the transition. But there was a benefit to doing so.

  To change was not all good. To stay put was not all bad. But there was a ratio of goodness-to-badness that, in the long run, was quite favorable for everyone involved. However in the short term it seemed so insurmountable, so ludicrous, that it beggared the belief of a large number of otherwise very intelligent people.

  For a species so famous for being adaptable to its environment, we certainly abhor change. Especially a change that involves any amount of money being spent.

  Cars

  John Gruber used car transmissions for his analogy, and it’s apt. When I learned to drive, my dad insisted that I learn on a manual transmission so I would be able to drive any car. I think this was a wise and valuable thing to do.

  But even having learned it, these days I drive an automatic. Nothing is black and white — I sacrifice maybe a tiny amount of fuel efficiency and a certain amount of control over my car in adverse situations that I generally never encounter. In exchange, my brain is freed up to focus on the the road ahead, getting where I’m going, and avoiding obstacles (strategy), not the minutiae of choosing the best possible gear ratio (tactics).

  Is a stick shift better than an automatic? No. Is an automatic better than a stick? No. This misses the point. A better question: Is a road full of drivers not distracted by the arcane inner workings of their vehicle safer? It’s likely. And that has a value. Possibly a value that outweighs the value offered by a stick shift if we aggregate it across everyone in the world who drives.

  Changing of the Guard

  When I think about the age ranges of people who fall into the Old World of computing, it is roughly bell-curved with Generation X (hello) approximately in the center. That, to me, is fascinating — Old World users are sandwiched between New World users who are both younger and older than them.

  Some elder family members of mine recently got New World cell phones. I watched as they loaded dozens of apps willy-nilly onto them which, on any other phone, would have turned it into a sluggish, crash-prone battery-vampire. But it didn’t happen. I no longer get summoned for phone help, because it is self-evident how to use it, and things just generally don’t go wrong like they used to on their Old World devices.

  New Worlders have no reason to be gun-shy about loading up their device with apps. Why would that break anything? Old Worlders on the other hand have been browbeaten to the point of expecting such behavior to lead to problems. We’re genuinely surprised when it doesn’t.

  But the New World scares the living hell out of a lot of the Old Worlders. Why is that?

  The Needs of the Few

  When the iPhone came out, I was immediately in love, but frustrated by the lack of an SDK. When an SDK came out, I was overjoyed, but frustrated by Apple’s process. As some high-profile problems began to pile up, I infamously railed against the whole idea right here on this very blog. I announced I was beginning a boycott of iPhone-based devices until changes were made, and I certainly, certainly was not going to buy any future iPhone-based products. I switched to various other devices that were a bit more friendly to Old Worlders.

  It lasted all of a month.

  For as frustrated as I was with the restrictions, those exact same restrictions made the New World device a high-performance, high-reliability, absolute workhorse of a machine that got out of my way and just let me get things accomplished.

  Nothing is simply black or white.

  Old Worlders are particularly sensitive to certain things that are simply non-issues to New Worlders. We learned about computers from the inside out. Many of us became interested in computers because they were hackable, open, and without restrictions. We worry that these New World devices are stifling the next generation of programmers. But can anyone point to evidence that that’s really happening? I don’t know about you, but I see more people carrying handheld computers than at any point in history. If even a small percentage of them are interested in “what makes this thing tick?” then we’ve got quite a few new programmers in the pipeline.

  The reason I’m starting to think the Old World is ultimately doomed is because we are bracketed on both sides by the New World, and those people being born today, post-iPhone and post-iPad, will never know (and probably not care) about how things used to work. Just as nobody today cares about floppies, and nobody has to care about manual transmissions if they don’t want to.

  If you total up everyone older than the beginning of the Old World, and every person yet to be born, you end up with a much greater number of people than there are in the Old World.

  And to that dramatically greater number of people, what do you think is more important? An easy-to-use, crash-proof device? Or a massively complex tangle of toolbars, menus, and windows because that’s what props up an entrenched software oligarchy?

  Fellow Old Worlders, I hate to tell you this: we are a minority. The question is not “will the desktop metaphor go away?” The question is “why has it taken this long for the desktop metaphor to go away?”

  But, But I’m a Professional!

  This is a great toy for newbies, but how am I supposed to get any SERIOUS work done with it? After all, I’m a PRO EXPERT MEGA USER! I MUST HAVE TOOLBARS, WINDOWS, AND…

  OK, stop for a second.

  First, I would put the birth of New World computing at 2007, with the introduction of the iPhone. You could even arguably stretch it a bit further back to the birth of “Web 2.0” applications in the early 2000s. But it’s brand new. If computers in general are young, New World computing is fresh out of the womb, covered in blood and screaming.

  It’s got a bit of development to go.

  I encourage you to look at this argument in terms of what you are really trying to achieve rather than the way you are used to going about it.

  Let’s pick a ridiculous example and say I work in digital video, and I need to encode huge amounts of video data into some advanced format, and send that off to a server somewhere. I could never do that on an iPad! Right?

  Well, no, today, probably not. But could you do it on a future New World computer in the general sense?

  Remember, the hardware is a non-issue: Flash storage will grow to terabytes in size. CPUs will continue to multiply in power as they always have. Displays, batteries, everything will improve given enough time.

  As I see it, many of these “BUT I’M AN EXPERT” situations can be resolved by making just a few key modifications:

  1. A managed way of putting processes in the background. New Worlders are benefiting already from the improved performance and battery life provided by the inability to run a task in the background. Meanwhile, Old Worlders are tearing their hair out. I CAN’T MULTITASK, right? It seems like there has to be a reasonable middle ground. Maybe processes can petition the OS for background time. Maybe a user can “opt-in” to background processes. I don’t know. But it seems like there must be an in-between that doesn’t sacrifice what we’ve gained for some of the flexibility we’re used to.

  2. A way of sharing data with other devices. New World devices are easy to learn and highly usable because they do not expose the filesystem to users and they are “data islands”. We are no longer working with “files” but we are still working with data blobs that it would be valuable to be able to exchange with each other. Perhaps the network wins here. Perhaps flash drives that we never see the contents of. The Newton was, to my knowledge, the first generally available device where you could just say “put this app and all data I’ve created with it on this removable card” without ever once seeing a file or a folder. Its sizable Achilles’ Heel was that only other Newtons understood the data format.

  3. A way of sharing data between applications. Something like the clipboard, but bigger. This is not a filesystem, but a way of saying “bring this data object from this app to this app”. I’ve made this painting in my painting app, and now I want to bring it over here to crop it and apply filters.

  By just addressing those three things (and I admit they are not simple feats), I think all but the absolutely most specialized of computer tasks become quite feasible on a New World device.

  A Bet on the Future

  Apple is calling the iPad a “third category” between phones and laptops. I am increasingly convinced that this is just to make it palatable to you while everything shifts to New World ideology over the next 10-20 years.

  Just like with floppy disks, the rest of the industry is quite content to let Apple be the ones to stick their necks out on this. It’s a gamble to be sure. But if Apple wins the gamble (so far it’s going well), they are going to be years and years ahead of their competition. If Apple loses the gamble, well, they have no debt and are sitting on a Fort Knox-like pile of cash. It’s not going to sink them.

  The bet is roughly that the future of computing:

  1. has a UI model based on direct manipulation of data objects
  2. completely hides the filesystem from the user
  3. favors ease of use and reduction of complexity over absolute flexibility
  4. favors benefit to the end-user rather than the developer or other vendors
  5. lives atop built-to-specific-purpose native applications and universally available web apps

  All in all, it sounds like a pretty feasible outcome, and really not a bad one at that.

  But we Old Worlders have to come to grips with the fact that a lot of things we are used to are going away. Maybe not for a while, but they are.

  Will the whole industry move to New World computing? Not unless Apple is demonstrably successful with this approach. So I’d say you’re unlikely to see it universally applied to all computing devices within the next couple of decades.

  But Wednesday’s keynote tells me this is where Apple is going. Plan accordingly.

  How long will it take to complete this Old World to New World shift? My guess? The end is near when you can bootstrap a new iPad application on an iPad. When you can comfortably do that without pining for a traditional desktop, the days of Old World computing are officially numbered.

  The iPad as a particular device is not necessarily the future of computing. But as an ideology, I think it just might be. In hindsight, I think arguments over “why would I buy this if I already have a phone and a laptop?” are going to seem as silly as “why would I buy an iPod if it has less space than a Nomad?”

1. mrbushido liked this
2. ikenny81 reblogged this from stevenf
3. demoabi reblogged this from stevenf
4. demo-abi liked this
5. enamu liked this
6. cts- reblogged this from stevenf
7. jespino liked this
8. thetroublewithnormal reblogged this from stevenf
9. nathanbowers liked this
10. recursionandresolution liked this
11. tso liked this
12. vikramkone reblogged this from stevenf
13. antirobot liked this
14. tumblographr reblogged this from stevenf and added:

    “big picture” analysis

15. matthewb liked this
16. nzben reblogged this from stevenf
17. nevermore liked this
18. chillywillycd liked this
19. levifig liked this
20. itsjustcavan liked this
21. baronvonaaron reblogged this from stevenf
22. thisisdaniel liked this
23. bronxred reblogged this from stevenf
24. theseanwilson liked this
25. fcpage reblogged this from stevenf
26. dutchashell liked this
27. dudup liked this
28. lloyd reblogged this from stevenf
29. jeremiahclark reblogged this from stevenf and added:

    then some. I’m so glad

30. ankushnarula liked this
31. analogkid liked this
32. andreslucero liked this
33. innerfusion liked this
34. nathan-degruchy reblogged this from stevenf
35. gross liked this
36. mellowfuckingout liked this
37. wowfreemagic liked this
38. megacrash reblogged this from stevenf
39. twistmac liked this
40. anygivenwebdork reblogged this from stevenf
41. lizwong liked this
42. momusradar liked this
43. 3rdmartini reblogged this from stevenf
44. jeeves liked this
45. chrbutler liked this
46. skogkatt reblogged this from stevenf
47. hugons liked this
48. czottmann liked this
49. tysoncrosbie liked this
50. glass liked this
51. vellum liked this
52. tpoc liked this
53. ctmagnus liked this
54. johanbakken liked this
55. beyondidlechatter liked this
56. squarebrackets reblogged this from stevenf
57. rathole reblogged this from stevenf and added:

    Really great piece...possibly, spearheaded

58. cschack liked this
59. jameswd reblogged this from mrgan
60. lyricalvenus liked this
61. lovart liked this
62. justinlowery liked this
63. trmw liked this
64. shiv53 liked this
65. g33cx reblogged this from stevenf
66. ryansnyder liked this
67. ka1347 liked this
68. kevywevy liked this
69. monstersetc liked this
70. willwade liked this
71. gdeciantis liked this
72. wnstnlinks liked this
73. joeybaker liked this
74. andylaub liked this
75. andyfranck liked this
76. wilosb liked this
77. junkdrawer liked this
78. jesusf liked this
79. elrolio reblogged this from stevenf
80. ekosoton liked this
81. eportelance liked this
82. jaredsinclair liked this
83. insane-dreamer reblogged this from stevenf
84. ramkumarshankar reblogged this from stevenf and added:

    stevenf.com Read

85. minisagas liked this
86. nimbosa reblogged this from stevenf
87. danielberggren liked this
88. benzado liked this
89. richiety liked this
90. mobial liked this
91. wishesdontwork reblogged this from stevenf
92. brianrecchia liked this
93. paulfidalgo liked this
94. davidhoffman liked this
95. five5five reblogged this from mappeal
96. djsteen liked this
97. chriscrutchfield reblogged this from stevenf
98. davidchin liked this
99. featherlights liked this
100. bitdepth liked this
101. thijsjacobs liked this
102. mattchan reblogged this from jsj
103. erice liked this
104. dannug reblogged this from stevenf
105. squareangle liked this
106. malau reblogged this from stevenf
107. veken liked this
108. jrk liked this
109. dhotson reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     really great article by Steven Frank, it’s well worth...most interesting

110. recycledspace liked this
111. maccog liked this
112. wiredhead liked this
113. simplicityiscomplicated reblogged this from stevenf
114. dayofthedreamweavers liked this
115. simstim liked this
116. custardslaststand liked this
117. pete reblogged this from stevenf
118. thegnartist reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     Ipad Won’t know till...hands (which should...start...

119. coralium reblogged this from stevenf
120. jacobterry reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     A really interesting read...Steven Frank thinks...computing....

121. lukees liked this
122. sime0n liked this
123. playstadium liked this
124. andrewf403 liked this
125. carles-tm liked this
126. johnsj liked this
127. ingrassia liked this
128. jcbd reblogged this from stevenf
129. futuraprime reblogged this from stevenf
130. alexbain liked this
131. celebritarian liked this
132. scamper liked this
133. chartier liked this
134. drumby liked this
135. whitneymcn liked this
136. pastspresent reblogged this from stevenf
137. mmar reblogged this from stevenf
138. azspot liked this
139. thought-parade liked this
140. pbjorklund reblogged this from stevenf
141. padraig reblogged this from mrgan
142. carmelhassan reblogged this from stevenf
143. gretyl reblogged this from stevenf
144. georges reblogged this from stevenf
145. internetclippings liked this
146. ags liked this
147. danprovostthesis liked this
148. collectedwisdom liked this
149. aboutnothing liked this
150. kyleslattery liked this
151. 2arrs2ells reblogged this from marco and added:

     This is The Future of the Internet JZ warned us of…

152. hashtagblog liked this
153. jesuislagretch liked this
154. bromr liked this
155. ab-imo-pectore liked this
156. mxmlsm liked this
157. mgurgel liked this
158. jpoh liked this
159. femmebot liked this
160. akshayashah liked this
161. andygeek liked this
162. ihaveadictionary liked this
163. fairytales4grownups liked this
164. dalasverdugo liked this
165. xhotin liked this
166. partybox liked this
167. fnordmotors reblogged this from stevenf
168. sb1 reblogged this from stevenf
169. zyotism liked this
170. hypertexty liked this
171. qliu liked this
172. kentarosuda reblogged this from stevenf
173. orthoonc liked this
174. introvertedblue liked this
175. gumnos reblogged this from stevenf
176. tooepic liked this
177. shujin reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     wholeheartedly agree with stevenf’s opinion. Go read...full article, it’s

178. jstoff liked this
179. mdgarner liked this
180. erikschmidt reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     Every “Best Tech Blog Posts...excellent piece. Frank nails

181. spl72 reblogged this from stevenf
182. 2und40 reblogged this from stevenf
183. thefrugalminimalist reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     stevenf. He has eloquently...be ‘the future’...is. Casual...

184. sixinten liked this
185. michee liked this
186. jeffreymfoster reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     particular strikes...truth, even outside

187. modernrambler liked this
188. evocateur liked this
189. sailingfanblues liked this
190. obstacle reblogged this from stevenf
191. halostatue liked this
192. terre-rouge reblogged this from stevenf
193. trey liked this
194. caoszetta liked this
195. ofenzasojo liked this
196. softarts liked this
197. paintspace reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     here: http://stevenf.tumblr.com/post/359224392/i-need-to-talk-to-you-about-computers-ive-been

198. kratlee liked this
199. pwinn liked this
200. geometriques reblogged this from bendelaney
201. mandula reblogged this from stevenf
202. hirbehozo liked this
203. gresh reblogged this from stevenf
204. collideous reblogged this from stevenf
205. dougscripts liked this
206. tofias liked this
207. whileyouweregone liked this
208. provenescapades reblogged this from marco
209. maniacalrage liked this
210. prophecyboy liked this
211. kngofwrld liked this
212. mwunsch liked this
213. jeremynicolas reblogged this from stevenf
214. lather reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     someone who owned...completely agree. More importantly…

215. schwuk reblogged this from stevenf
216. sebastiandadal liked this
217. james3c liked this
218. jmoswalts reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     Amazing analysis

219. atsween liked this
220. poeks liked this
221. darylcheng liked this
222. donchiefnerd liked this
223. enkrates liked this
224. tetractys reblogged this from marco and added:

     cosign. i also appreciate marco’s grown-up computing article. He nails it as always (or has been nailing it for a while...

225. andyweezy liked this
226. thepatches liked this
227. davidham liked this
228. olive42 liked this
229. joshuajabbour liked this
230. shabdar liked this
231. essdogg liked this
232. srudersdorf liked this
233. frijole liked this
234. swimparallel liked this
235. nicole-z reblogged this from stevenf
236. lalitree liked this
237. mccreath reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     Excellent piece.

238. dwr liked this
239. pdc liked this
240. marco reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     computing, despite...occasional kicking...next logical...

241. vrjbln liked this
242. jakepaul liked this
243. emanuelschwarz liked this
244. lucius liked this
245. jbreazeale liked this
246. quatermain liked this
247. adamwhite liked this
248. brier liked this
249. andrewjaustin liked this
250. cdharrison liked this
251. filjedi reblogged this from stevenf
252. kfan liked this
253. ishnoob reblogged this from stevenf
254. boostventilator liked this
255. dascola liked this
256. thememegeneration liked this
257. jollilama liked this
258. sethlilly liked this
259. everythinglikesuchasblah reblogged this from stevenf
260. carlosefonseca liked this
261. winandtonic liked this
262. moltz liked this
263. attaboy liked this
264. couch liked this
265. snc liked this
266. mjhoy liked this
267. fholgado liked this
268. jxnblk liked this
269. jamiepinkham liked this
270. tbridge liked this
271. bobthecow liked this
272. gregbabula liked this
273. smerickson liked this
274. eagereyes liked this
275. texburgher reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     If you’re wondering...primary use case...iPad, I think...

276. deepthinking reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     found, well key -

277. mman liked this
278. steelopus liked this
279. aulia-m liked this
280. monkeyairplane reblogged this from mrgan
281. dealmeup liked this
282. mnmal liked this
283. foolis liked this
284. elektroholunder liked this
285. jamesgill reblogged this from stevenf
286. sanatgersappa reblogged this from stevenf
287. augmentationcanister liked this
288. kaysein liked this
289. paulstraw liked this
290. kurafire liked this
291. moertl liked this
292. mckinneycantwrite liked this
293. andymatuschak liked this
294. 0049 reblogged this from bendelaney
295. hauptstadt liked this
296. dalenapier liked this
297. sixhoursago liked this
298. goldenberg liked this
299. scott-jackson liked this
300. gdollars liked this
301. jeremyturner liked this
302. jackcheng liked this
303. tiffehr liked this
304. mattsmoustache liked this
305. waltdickinson liked this
306. emonk liked this
307. punkassjim reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     anything (positive...very keen analytical eye. Very good insight, here.

308. whitemeadows liked this
309. timomorris liked this
310. doublejack liked this
311. gamenerdery liked this
312. letsgetawesome liked this
313. asimpson reblogged this from stevenf
314. bustr reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     article. Read it....healthy reminder

315. quanganhdo liked this
316. cbrough liked this
317. alternatekev liked this
318. seoulbrother liked this
319. redcloud liked this
320. centrifugal-splitter reblogged this from mrgan and added:

     You can’t say for sure that someone would leave on impulse of mere gigahertz friend. Its more of a flexibility. Some...

321. calebsexton liked this
322. gblakeman liked this
323. mappeal reblogged this from mrgan
324. ready-able liked this
325. superamit liked this
326. jsj reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     also encapsulates

327. geekfriendly liked this
328. theluther liked this
329. jaydensmommie liked this
330. dwineman liked this
331. jonhall liked this
332. alinasmith liked this
333. scrufus liked this
334. mrgan reblogged this from stevenf and added:

     Epic knowledge dropped by stevenf tonight:...(Read the whole thing, please. Done? Cool.)...

335. moustache liked this
336. bendelaney reblogged this from stevenf
337. mattonrails liked this
338. benkraal liked this
339. etymologica reblogged this from stevenf
340. skelly liked this
341. stevenf posted this

← Previous post     Next post →

Beam me up Scotty!